We review the documents, the processes and the risks before someone from outside does. You receive a list of non-conformities, ordered by what it costs you if things stay as they are.
Request an audit →The addenda were done in a hurry, the job descriptions date from a hire three years ago, the internal rules are a version downloaded from somewhere. The time records say one thing, the actual working hours another.
The gap only shows when an inspection, a complaint or a pre-financing review arrives. At that point the conversation is no longer about what you meant to do, but about what you can prove with documents.
We check the real documents, not the templates in the folder: contracts, addenda, job descriptions, time records, leave records, internal rules, disciplinary procedures.
Findings are ordered by exposure, not by the order in which we found them.
Correction is optional: we take it on, or it stays with your team, based on the plan in the report.
The duration of the audit is set according to the size of the organisation and the documents available.
We send you the exact list of documents and a list of questions. We do not ask for anything we will not use in the report.
On site we compare what the documents say with what actually happens: time records, working hours, business trips, signatures and filing. The length of the visit is set according to the scope of the check.
A written report with every finding, the legal basis, the estimated risk and the recommended action. We go through it together, point by point.
We draft the missing documents, update the internal rules and the procedures, then check again after implementation.
Four fields for every point found. No general phrasing and no references to „best practice".
Every point is written the same way: the finding, the legal basis, the risk and the proposed action.
FIELD 1
What we found, on which document or process, with the concrete example.
FIELD 2
The article or provision that applies to the situation found.
FIELD 3
What can happen if it stays as it is, and how exposed you are.
FIELD 4
What needs to be done, who is responsible and in what order of priority.
You have not reviewed the personnel documents in over a year.
You have had an inspection or a complaint and want to know what else could come up.
You have taken over HR from someone else and do not know what you are inheriting.
You are preparing for financing, an external audit or a sale of the company.
The audit shows the situation at the time of the review, based on the documents and information provided. It does not replace legal advice and does not guarantee the outcome of an inspection.
We have written separately about how we would approach the situation where the files are complete but do not reflect practice. See the example of how we work